Why Jewish Students Do Not Know the Zionist/Israeli Narrative
By Dr. Kenneth W. Stein
April 6, 2003
Dr. Kenneth W. Stein teaches Middle Eastern and Israeli history at Emory
University in Atlanta, Georgia.
This article is a shortened version of a luncheon address, "Israel on
Campus," which he presented to the February 2003 annual meeting of the
Board of Governors of the American Jewish Committee.
After the outbreak of the Palestinian intifadah in September 2000, trips
to Israel virtually ceased. Acknowledged to be a key antidote to
creeping assimilation and inter-marriage (along with day school and
Jewish camping experiences), North American Jews, for the time being at
least, had face-to-face contacts with Israelis almost fully suspended.
A second slap occurred when negative discussions about Israeli policies
increased on North American university campuses. Jewish students were,
for the most part, inadequately prepared to answer questions about the
origins of Zionism or incapable of defending Israel because they lacked
the facts. With or without trips to Israel, we learned that Jewish
students did not know their own narrative. How did that happen?
Before Israel's creation, North American Jewish organizations imbibed
"Israel" from episodic lectures, presentations, and symposia, listening
to talks of a half-hour or less. For only a third of the North American
Jewish population who were affiliated in any fashion, these were
wonderful updates on the "matzav"(situation) today and tomorrow, but
almost no time was spent in learning the historical context. Israelis
and Israeli-born professionals suffused camp and Jewish school
environments to organize activities and teach about Israel. Celebrating
Yom-Hashoah and Yom HaAzmaut were important but not substantive.
In the early years of Israel's existence, the small minority of American
Jews who identified with Zionism chose advocacy for Israel's survival
and philanthropy to support the Jewish state. Unremitting Arab
antagonism toward Israel from the Arab world and the Soviet Union kept
American Jewry focused on both. In the 1950s and 1960s, American Jews
adopted Israeli culture, foods, and songs as part of their Jewish
identity in America. What a wonderfully convenient formula to continue
assimilating yet enjoy Israel's culture, grow materially and support
Israel financially, make it in America, and use Israel as your
"religious" icon. We judged our successes year to year by how much more
money we raised "card for card," a critically important function in
saving Jews in crisis, need, and peril. We learned to use power to gain
access to decision-makers, vowing never again to be powerless in the
face of dictators or anti-Semites. So, we licked more stamps per capita
than any other ethnic group and displayed power far beyond our numbers.
While advocacy and philanthropy prevailed, our collective Jewish
narrative focused on victimization, remembering the Holocaust. When
Jewish Studies programs exploded on university campuses in the 1970s,
endowed chairs in Holocaust studies were established, but equal
treatment was not given to the study of Zionist/Israeli history. More
recently, with Palestinian suicide bombings against Israelis and
outbreaks of anti-Semitic acts in Europe, collective memories were
reinforced that persecution against Jews is not just a drummed-up fear
that belongs in the past but has validity in the immediate present.
One of the few places where Zionism and Israel can and should be taught
is in Jewish academic settings, such as day schools, congregational
schools, adult education programs, camp experiences, and in American
Jewish organizational settings. And yet, we find from the vast majority
of eighty K-12 teachers who took week-long intensive learning courses
about Israeli society, history, and politics at Emory University in June
2000 and 2002 (a small sampling of Jewish school teachers in North
America to be sure), their discomfort in teaching Zionism or Israel does
not come from disinterest, far from it, but from a lack of knowledge
about the very Zionist/Israeli narrative they would be expected to
teach. These highly dedicated teachers also suggested that severe time
constraints limit the amount of time available to teach Zionism/Israeli
topics.
Knowing Zionist history does not negate the importance of philanthropy
nor does it diminish the critical nature of advocacy. By not knowing
our own narrative, the points of argumentative departure are someone
else's. Voila, Jewish students are on the defensive.
When trips start again, teaching and knowing the narrative will make
connections deeper and more meaningful. When we were not an emancipated
people, we had time for learning. Knowing the narrative might stem
assimilation. Knowledge is empowerment.
"Card for card" increases are splendid, but so are annual double-digit
increases in knowledge per person. On our doorposts in the mezzuzah is
written, "teach them diligently unto the children." Well, we have not
done a very good job.
|
|
|